Who owns these walls?

Catherine Story
Managing editor

Lyndon is not my school.
The halls are plain or decorated with manufactured admissions propaganda and the events are generic and unimaginative. This campus has never looked like a student friendly or student run community.

The question I ask is: who really owns this school?

The reason I am dwelling on the ownership of this school is the recent expunging of student art in the hallways.

I realize the “danger” of having students feel that they can paint on any wall on campus without repercussions. There are always people who do things through hatred and angst and the school does not want those views to be a community representation.
There is however the question of who makes the decision of what can and cannot be put on the walls. Whose opinions does this school represent?

The faculty and administration of this college are put in place and paid to help students develop into freethinking and intelligent adults.

It’s upsetting for me to hear staff ask, “what gives students the right,” when discussing the painting project of the experiencing the arts class. My question is what gives the administration the right to demand that students get permission?
There is a web of paperwork that students need to fill out to do anything around campus that usually slips into the student services department and is never seen again. It is only through the SGA that students are granted money to create new activities and clubs and that SGA is made up of bitter club representatives who would generally prefer to be elsewhere.

The dilemma that is posed to me is the assertion that the administration has taken to wipe out the student artwork when they claim that the campus is too broke to pay for independent studies or up to date technology. Why are the man-hours and paint supplies so readily available to wipe out creative thought but not available to help students learn?

The administration may claim to embrace the creative and artistic students within the college but it seems quite the opposite when you hash through their actions. There is a new music room in the lower level of Vail that students are supposed to be able to practice in. Unfortunately because of the location, right below the administration offices, they are not allowed to practice before 4:30 p.m.

The students on this campus are treated like visitors. They are not allowed to leave a mark or make too much inconvenient noise. It’s the mentality of an administration and faculty that refuses to embrace their student’s creativity and expression without specific guidelines and restrictions that causes student’s lack of involvement as well as the low retention rates.

I doubt the school realizes the message they are sending their new students when they cover up paintings because of a little bit of mess. If the campus is having trouble with freshmen retention it’s probably not a good idea to erase freshman artwork from the halls.

Perhaps Elizabeth Norris, Department Chair of Music and Performing Arts, misunderstood, President, Carol Moore when she said, “I picture artwork on every single wall,” in her state of the college address. It seems she meant a picture that the admissions department purchases or perhaps she wants more big screen TVs displaying Power Points.